Spoems - O dhimmi Canada

O dhimmi Canada

Back


Free speech: Use it or lose it. Canada's thought police http://www.nypost.com/seven/12162007/postopinion/editorials/canadas_thought_police_72483.htm Muslims test press freedom http://www.reuters.com/article/mediaNews/idUSN0325508520080106 Protect us from human rights commissions http://thechronicleherald.ca/Columnists/1024759.html Mark Steyn and the thought police http://www.economist.com/world/la/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10499144 Check out Ezra Levant's channel http://www.youtube.com/EzraILevant You can download an audio version of this video at http://patcondell.libsyn.com/

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: January 19, 2008 at 5:10 am
Author: patcondell

Length: 0:06:20
Rating: 4.76
Views: 310,261

Tags: atheist atheism religion Islam Muslim dhimmi Canada human rights

Video Thumbnail #1:




Video Thumbnail #2:




Video Thumbnail #3:




Video Url:


Embed Code:


Video Comments:
CAFoster58 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:53:08 PM)
We should wonder why he his not willing to debate the claim that he has made.
CAFoster58 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:52:41 PM)
"ExposingCondell2" makes a claim that there has been no support when talking about modern historiographic methods and the Gospel of Luke. But I have challenged "ExposingCondell2" to debate that very thing, and he has refused.
CAFoster58 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:51:23 PM)
My point, here, is that Condell's lack of attention to posted comments and emails is reasonable, and Josiah's complaints that they are not read is not reasonable, under the circumstances. It constitutes a petty complaint. The hypocrisy is in Josiah's complaint when one considers that he (Josiah) likewise does not generally respond to criticisms of his comments.
CAFoster58 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:50:25 PM)
No reasonable person would expect the channel operator, if that is the correct term, to respond to a fraction of those comments, let alone all of them, especially when one considers that the number of channel comments must be weighed with respect to the quality and usefulness of them. This is YouTube, after all, and so we can easily dismiss most of the comments as nonsensical and not worthy of time to rebut
CAFoster58 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:49:48 PM)
Even a cursory examination of the main channel comment area provides some verification. There are presently over 26,600 comments posted there. That's an average of 40 comments per day, since Condell first created the channel and, of course, no one would deny that the number of daily posts, today, will likely far exceed the number of posts, per day, that were appearing when the channel was young.
CAFoster58 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:48:56 PM)
Ah, thanks.
dave0258 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:48:45 PM)
Oops. All yours, Chris.
CAFoster58 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:47:59 PM)
The activities of TurnerDiaries (Josiah Avraham Ben Morgan HaNasi II) and his many sock puppets have been excellent examples of a young, obsessive, and sociopathic theist. Much of his commentary takes on a tone of personal animosity toward those with whom he disagrees, especially Pat Condell. But in many of his criticisms, we find obvious hypocrisy. This particular comment has been reposted many times across several of Condell's video comment sections:
CAFoster58 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:46:28 PM)
Readers and interested audience members have, no doubt and for months, been amused and entertained by the obsessive behavior of Josiah Avraham Ben Morgan HaNasi II, also known as "TurnerDiaries," "ExposingCondell," along with other sock puppets, as he posts almost-daily tirades into the comment sections of videos that have been posted by English pundit Pat Condell.
dave0258 (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:44:30 PM)
As usual, "ExposingCondell2" is more interested in spamming comment areas instead of debating the issues.