Spoetry - Submit your own Spoems

kickyerass (Sunday 23rd of November 2008 07:41:43 PM)

algore is such a criminal scumbag, there ought to be a class-action lawsuit against this huckster! But I'm most saddened by the fact that there are so many gazillions of sheeples out there following his and others BULLSHIT!

pvsheridan (Thursday 13th of November 2008 09:39:50 AM)

Do a search for the following phrase: Global warning: We are actually heading towards a new Ice Age, claim scientists Report of 13 Nov 2008. "Lead author Thomas Crowley from the University of Edinburgh and Canadian colleague William Hyde say that currently vilified greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide could actually be the key to averting the chill." So now CO2 is my friend??!! I should make some??

zaurakdigis (Thursday 23rd of October 2008 08:59:19 AM)

Solar activity does wax and wane, the earth also wobbles so the position of equator changes. There is a natural cycle it however appears human activity has amplified it. The earth will survive it. Will humans? The sun is major driver but gases can trap that energy and keep it from escaping.

pvsheridan (Wednesday 12th of November 2008 10:02:07 AM)

"There is a natural cycle it however appears human activity has amplified it." Just say anything, is that your pathetic ploy? Laughable, "The sun is major driver but gases can trap that energy and keep it from escaping." Geez, such intelligence, but ZERO integrity. How come no mentioning of water vapor? No mentioning of CO2 sinks? Now that the truth is emerging and the liars are being exposed, losers like you are now deploying ad hoc responses as rebuttals? Don't make us all LAUGH!

bodmas1000 (Sunday 5th of October 2008 08:23:05 PM)

First it was the commies,then it was UFO`s,then it was terrorism,now its Climate change,anything to scare the masses,and divert your attention away from what there up to.WAKE UP AMERICA YOUR DREAMING.

thinkpolicy (Monday 29th of September 2008 01:15:24 PM)

. Definition of U.N. Science: A theory supported not by observation but by ad hominem arguments against its detractors .

pizgacz22 (Friday 26th of September 2008 04:40:38 PM)

IF true, whats wrong with that?!? It's ok if big companies fund agw histeria spreading organisations (and making money on that)?

ernieelu (Friday 19th of September 2008 12:44:01 AM)

$50,000 per year it must be a massive center, I know organizations where that wouldn't cover their pens and stationary supplies for a year! Let alone run an office. Get real.

jbtascam (Thursday 18th of September 2008 08:01:56 AM)

And the IPCC would continue to exist if man had nothing to do with Climate Change? Talk about a vested interest......

pizgacz22 (Friday 26th of September 2008 04:43:42 PM)

Making money on AGW alarmism is a great business. Look at honda's sales, Al Gore's co2 company income etc.